The list of forecasting systems participating to the simulations is reported below
| System | Institute | Modelling/Boundary-Conditions | Initialisation/Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFS-HRES | ECMWF | Global, TCO1279L137, 9Km, CY45R1 | ERA5+4D-VAR/EDA |
| IFS-HRES-Future | ECMWF | Global, TCO2559L137, 4Km, CY45R1 | ERA5+4D-VAR/EDA |
| IFS-ENS | ECMWF | Global, TCO639L137, 16Km, CY45R1 | ERA5+4D-VAR/EDA |
| COSMO | ARPAP | LAM, 1km VL?, ECMWF BCs | ECMWF |
| COSMO-LEPS | ARPAER | LAM, 1km VL?, ECMWF BCs | ECMWF |
| BOLAM-MOLOC | ISAC-CNR | LAM, ?km VL?, ? | ECMWF |
| WRF | CIMA | 1.5 km setup operativo (13.5, 4.5, 1.5 km double nested) https://www.cimafoundation.org/fondazioni/ricerca-sviluppo/wrf.html | GFS |
| WRF/Moloch/Meso-NH | LAMMA | LAM, 500m, L60, Double-nested | ECMWF |
Experiments submitted
| Experiment Id (for MARS retrieval) | User Id | Dates |
|---|---|---|
| 3738 (Analysis and Forecasts experiments) at TL1279 (18km IFS as operational in June 2016) | eras | |
| h6bg (Forecast HRES 45r1) | pad | Experiment submitted to assess the 45r1 quality in reproducing the PF94 (one month forecast to evaluate scored w.r.t. ERA5). Contacts:Linus Magnusson and Gianpaolo Balsamo |
| h9xi (Forecast HRES 46r1) | dag | Experiment (with Oper Output) submitted to assess the 46r1 quality in reproducing the PF94 https://apps.ecmwf.int/mars-catalogue/?levtype=sfc&type=fc&class=rd&stream=oper&expver=h9xi |
| h9zy (Forecast HRES 46r1) 3-4-5-6 November 1994 | dag | Experiment (with Oper Output) submitted to assess the 46r1 quality in reproducing the PF94 https://apps.ecmwf.int/mars-catalogue/?stream=oper&levtype=sfc&expver=h9zy&date=1994-11-03&type=fc&class=rd |
| ha6i (ENS 46r1) | diad | Ensemble forecast initialised from ERA5 on 1994-11-03 00Z https://apps.ecmwf.int/mars-catalogue/?stream=enfo&expver=ha6i&date=1994-11-03&class=rd |
5 Comments
Gabor Radnoti
TL1279, it is not 9km.
Gianpaolo Balsamo
corrected
Gabor Radnoti
GP, I couldnt run TCo 1279, only TL because i used 41r2, like era5. This is an era5 setup, it would have been too much work to adapt it to 45r1 and 41r2 did not know TCo
Gianpaolo Balsamo
Thanks Gabor, that is fine as we can run the FC-only RD runs at TCO1279 HRES and TCO639 with ENS having Fullpos doing the interpolations. Do you think we can use the 3738 as INIEXPVER?
Gabor Radnoti
There is a good chance that for fc only you will be able to use a more recent cycle, like 45r1 and TCo1279. I had to go back to ERA5 setup
with 4DVAR mostly because of observation related issues. I cant see any reason why fc-only wouldnt work in standard 45r1.