Hi. I am working on seasonal forecast recently and found seasonal hindcast data on CDS. But I found that downloading seasonal forecast data on pressure levels always took dozens of hours to process. For example, here is the API request:
Originating centre:
CMCC
System:
3
Variable:
Geopotential
Pressure level:
500 hPa
Product type:
Monthly mean
Year:
1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016
Month:
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
Leadtime month:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Whole available region:
Format:
GRIB
It has been "in process" for 20 hours and I even don't know when it will finish. However, it seems that variables on surface level, such as precipitation, MSLP is significantly faster to be prepared. Is there any trick to speed up downloading data on pressure levels? Do I need to split the dataset by years or months, or select more levels or variables to avoid the time of abstracting data?
Thank you!
6 Comments
Michela Giusti
Hi,
Users are encouraged to devise their requests as follows:
Thanks
Michela
Weixin Jin
That is very helpful to me. Thank you!
X DW
Hi,
In your recommadations above, you said that we CDS users can combine some variables and time(like less than one month) we interest in one request.
However, in my attempts, i've found a series of failure on doing like this. With messages like
"Exception: the request you have submitted is not valid. Expected 1, got 137.; Request failed; Some errors reported (last error -1)."Request for ERA5 model level data t in a time.
"Exception: the request you have submitted is not valid. Expected 1, got 720.; Request failed; Some errors reported (last error -1)." Request for ERA5 model level data lnsp in one month.
Are these restrictions on retrieving model level data? Or what other methods i can use to retrieve model level data more efficient?
Thanks.
Davy.
Kevin Marsh
Hi Davy,
In this case you need to check the variable you are requesting. Some variables are only defined on 1 model level, rather than all 137. This could be the cause of the error you see.
Hope that helps,
Kevin
X DW
Hi Kevin,
I've figured out my mistake. Thanks
Wish you a happy weekend.
^^
Davy.
yin chang jian
Hi kevin,
I want to konw lnsp(Logarithm of surface pressure) only defined on 1 model level?